fading dot - you are suppose to look at the blue dot in the middle and it is suppose to fade into the green
wigs and robbing banks - you can't really describe people as best as you think you can, people look different in many ways
sliding grey scale - they are suppose to disappear then come back
shimmer - it is suppose to make it move
bird in a cage - if you look at one bird for 20 seconds then look away then you see the bird
Mona - it makes the appearance look different because it is upside down
squirming palm - you are seeing movement when you stare for a long period of time so you think it is moving but it isn't
depth spinner - this shows you that if it spins a certain way and you stare at it then you look at the wall and it makes it move towards you, that's what I got
disappearing act - you see how fast you can spot the animal
fastball reaction time - my reaction time was 0.26 seconds and I got a base hit so it says most peoples reaction time would be 2 seconds.
1. Perceptual Judgments in sports - depth perception
2. depth cues - different kinds
3. test your understanding of depth perception - numbers of monocular depth cues
4. depth and motion - static situations
5. perceptual cues in every day life - uses these to make judgment on the sports fields
my score for the quiz is 10
Monday, April 20, 2015
Friday, April 10, 2015
Nash Equilibrium - where each group discusses a strategy but the other group doesn't know about the other.
Game Theory - where ones action depends on the other participants
Prisoner Dilemma - where two players have choices that depend on the other critically
In history - 1920's it started
In government - talks about Darwinism
In economics - it deals with most economics, if you deal with concepts
Related to sociology - it relates to this a bit
Related to psychology - yes it deals with a lot of psychology
In your everyday life - yes it happens everywhere where people make decisions
we did oil pricing in class with two different groups and we both agreed to cooperate and pick the same price but then not my group but the other group decided to go the other way so we got lied to. Then we did it where we chose colors and we all ended up choosing red every time and not blue, we eventually chose blue but then you would lose.
I would go with 10 because I enjoyed the game activities but I'm assuming we would have been better if we all just cooperated with each other and been honest with each other we both would of had a lot of money for our countries.
Game Theory - where ones action depends on the other participants
Prisoner Dilemma - where two players have choices that depend on the other critically
Well I started out with cooperate and so we both got the
same amount of coins but then I went off track and picked compete and I got
more which of course then he ended up going the same way so my point is if you
play fair then the other opponent plays fair but when you make an unexpected
twist, it all turns around.
Game theory/prisoners dilemma - when two people are faced to face with each other and have to make a choice on their own which could affect the other. In history - 1920's it started
In government - talks about Darwinism
In economics - it deals with most economics, if you deal with concepts
Related to sociology - it relates to this a bit
Related to psychology - yes it deals with a lot of psychology
In your everyday life - yes it happens everywhere where people make decisions
we did oil pricing in class with two different groups and we both agreed to cooperate and pick the same price but then not my group but the other group decided to go the other way so we got lied to. Then we did it where we chose colors and we all ended up choosing red every time and not blue, we eventually chose blue but then you would lose.
I would go with 10 because I enjoyed the game activities but I'm assuming we would have been better if we all just cooperated with each other and been honest with each other we both would of had a lot of money for our countries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)